(8)Tj Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter." This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. Near the end of discovery, it is wise to send out a more case-specific . /Kids [14 0 R 15 0 R] (15)Tj -72 -24 Td Q /Parent 8 0 R Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /Annots [] /Length 130 0 R /Length 132 0 R /Count 14 (3)Tj 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. /Type /Page >> /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff's Reply Also Objections To Defendant's Second Requirement ForDocuments And First Set The Interrogatories . >> >> The party, person, or attorney did not respond in good faith to a request for production of documents made pursuant to Section 2020.010, 2020.410, 2020.510, or 2025.210, or to an inspection demand made pursuant to Section 2031.010. )]TJ All rights reserved. [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ot)-1.1 (he)3.1 (r)2.9 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ q << endobj Response to Interrogatories . q (1. 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re /Rotate 0 T* 0 -431.088 l 286.67 0 Td -103.32 -24 Td Did I think this was ok or not? Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections, Plaintiff will produce the documents responsive to this request that have not already been produced and are not protected by the privileges listed above. [(G)7.1 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (E)-2.9 (R)1.9 (A)2 (L)-2.9 ( O)-1.2 (B)-2.9 (JE)-3.9 (C)2.7 (T)-3.7 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)]TJ f ( )Tj >> T* /Type /Pages 344.759 55.32 Td 156.829 43.19 Td Recently I received a telephone call from an attorney wanting to discuss whether opposing partys objections to her special interrogatories had any merit. T* /GS0 gs "During" can be construed to mean "at the time of," instead of "in the course of." /TT0 12 Tf -103.32 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf [(A)2 (m)-2 (e)4 (n)9.9 (de)4 (d)10 ( )-199 (a)3.1 (nd )10.8 (S)5.2 (upp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.7 (a)13.9 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)13.9 (que)14 (st)7 (s )-1.8 (f)2 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)6 (i)-1.9 (ons \()1.8 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, )9.1 (2017\))13 (])-6 (. Objections Sometimes, rather than responding about your ability to produce the requested documents or things, you may object to the request on legal grounds. Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiff's possession custody or control. >> 53 0 obj -109.44 -48 Td Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm /TT1 12 Tf /TT2 12 Tf [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.9293 679.0819 Tm << 65.4 648.61 Td ET See Objections 3-4 to Instructions and Definitions ("Objections 3-4"). Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT T* (22)Tj Such materials contain the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government's attorneys in summarizing the Government's understanding of information obtained in the interview, for instance by the emphasis in memoranda of the specific issues of interest to the Division's legal analysis. Such documents include notes of Plaintiff's attorneys and staff and draft and final internal memoranda of Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, interview memoranda, status memoranda, and recommendation memoranda. [(of)3 ( i)-2 (nf)3 (or)3.8 (m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (on pr)3.8 (ot)-2.7 (e)4.7 (c)3.2 (t)-12 (e)4.8 (d )-9.9 (b)-10.8 (y)20.7 ( t)-2.7 (he)4.7 ( )-10.7 (a)3.9 (t)-2 (t)-2 (or)3 (ne)-16 (y)20.8 (-)-7.7 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( pr)2.8 (i)-1.9 (vi)-2 (l)-2 (e)4 (g)10 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2 ( a)4 (t)-1.9 (t)-2 (or)3 (n)-9.1 (e)-16.9 (y)20.8 ( w)-8.8 (or)3.8 (k pr)3 (oduc)3.2 (t)-1.1 ( doc)3.1 (t)-1.9 (r)2.8 (i)-1.9 (ne)4.8 (. Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. >> 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re endstream 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.5293 75.2636 Tm Moreover, Plaintiff does not waive its right to amend its responses. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d c)3.2 (h)-10 (r)3.8 (oni)-2.7 (c)4.7 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)5 (y)20.9 ( )-10.8 (st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 ( )-10.9 (g)9.9 (l)-21.9 (y)20.8 (phosa)1.2 (te. << (5)Tj (11)Tj >> 67.32 0 Td /Artifact <>BDC All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. 36 -24 Td This request, in essence, then, asks for the recollections of the attorneys representing the United States, or of the staff working under their direction, or for information contained in memoranda and notes prepared by those attorneys and their staff. << T* f /Differences [24 /breve /caron /circumflex /dotaccent /hungarumlaut /ogonek /ring /tilde 39 endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm /Type /Page how to prove . Case(s): U.S. five. % T* -139.67 -24 Td (8)Tj 88.55 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf (16)Tj T* (19)Tj (22)Tj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> >> T* This is a preview of the sample document sold by LegalDocsPro on scribd.com )-1839.167 (A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( )-150 (t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( )-149.1 (M)-1.1 (ons)-1.8 (a)4.8 (nt)-2 (o )-149.9 (ha)13.9 (s )-151.8 (not)-2 ( )-150.9 (c)3.9 (on)10 (duc)14 (ted )-148.9 (a)4.8 ( )-139.9 (c)3 (hr)3 (on)-9 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 ( )-150 (t)-1.9 (oxi)-2 (c)3.9 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29.1 ( )-119.9 (s)-10.1 (t)-2.9 (ud)-19.1 (y)19 ( )-129.9 (o)-10 (f)3.8 ( )-160.8 (a)3.9 (n)-19 (y)19 ( )-149 (of)2.9 ( )-150.8 (t)-1.1 (he)3 ( )]TJ . )]TJ endobj (27)Tj >> T* General Objections The Department objects to each Interrogatory and Request insofar as it seeks production or disclosure of documents that require PWD or Raftelis Financial Consultants ("RFC") to undertake an extensive search for information not within its control or custody. T* /Annots [] /Annots [] x[oJr)7 y$r$ YyAYO=_lr>$@lvWI}(PMYwUeM^u[|Qc]|,Wst]y_Uk]]5e]^./C+xYUnjw_ ZwjovxN4rE 7e];)c]vQB{g+Uf]uoOo;cpf~.}"nDz NUjK{UVMyuS,_,\_/%bwiG}eauS^B`Cc[^|+/>,1 F"H#wH~-Iu?[R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] Objectives are steps towards goals. BT Subject to the above objections, Plaintiff has no responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control, other than those that have already been produced to Defendant and those being produced as verbatim statements of a third party in response to Request No. T* [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ 51.12 0 Td /Length 13 0 R 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm x+ | And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. /TT0 12 Tf T* /Order [] 44.77 0 Td (6. Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. ( )Tj ET /Parent 15 0 R Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. >> endobj (6)Tj )]TJ q T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm X/g. >> /Artifact <>BDC T* << /TT0 12 Tf [(a)4 (nd )9.9 (S)-3 (up)9.1 (p)10 (l)-2 (e)4 (m)-2 (e)14 (nt)-2 (a)13.9 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-4 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)2.9 ( )10.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-1.4 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-11.7 (une)3.9 ( )20.8 (29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. -39.96 -12 Td Q 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. T* x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! 2031.030(c) states: Each demand in a set shall be separately set forth, identified by number or letter, and shall do all of the following: (4)Tj 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re (6)Tj [(da)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-2 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)3.9 (om)-2.7 ( W)-6.1 (i)-1.1 (l)-2 (l)-2 (i)-2.8 (a)13.8 (m)-1.9 ( D)-7.1 (y)19 (kst)-2.8 (r)2.1 (a)4.8 (, P)-4.7 (h.D)1.9 (., To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2 (c)-6.9 (ol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7 (r)3.8 (a)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)4.8 (h, EP)-2.8 (A)2.8 ( H)2 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)-6.9 (r)3 (d E)1.8 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on )]TJ A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm )]TJ 36 0 Td /TT0 12 Tf C)-2.1 (i)-2.1 (v. P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4.1 (. >> /Contents [116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R] /Adieresis /Aring /AE /Ccedilla /Egrave /Eacute /Ecircumflex /Edieresis /Igrave /Iacute (7)Tj [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (nd)-9 (um)-2.9 ( da)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-1.9 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)2.2 (om)-1.1 ( )]TJ )]TJ [(doc)4 (um)-2 (e)4 (nt)-2 ( da)4.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d Ma)-8.6 (r)3.7 (c)4 (h 1)-10.7 (3, 1985, s)-1.4 (t)-2.2 (a)3.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( \223)2.9 (Mo)-1.8 (ns)-3.7 (a)4.8 (nt)-11.9 (o i)-2 (s )-2 (c)2 (onc)4 (e)4.9 (r)3 (n)-10.8 (e)4 (d t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( e)4.8 (ve)3.1 (n t)-11.9 (he)4.8 ( i)-2.8 (ni)-2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (a)3.1 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on of)2.1 ( )]TJ 44.75 0 Td ( )Tj )-70 ([)-6.1 (Th)11.8 (i)7.1 (s )-50.9 (R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (que)14 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.4768 86.2909 Tm ET 41 0 obj )Tj PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S SECONDREQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES. (4)Tj 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "statement" to any comment, observation, remark, observation, or affirmation, whether in written or oral form, made by a third party to Plaintiff during the Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 investigation. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ ( )Tj See Bihun v. AT&T Info. T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm q (18)Tj << /TT0 12 Tf (4)Tj 47.77 0 Td The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. (16)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm T* 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. /Parent 15 0 R /Type /Page regarding requests for production of documents. Telephones. 44.75 0 Td Each response, if any, is subject to any and all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and any and all Plaintiff objects to this document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of Plaintiff. [(t)-1.9 (ha)4.7 (t)-2.7 ( t)-2 (he)4.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.2 (um)-1.9 (e)3.8 (nt)-1.8 ( )]TJ /Parent 15 0 R [(D)2 (E)-3.8 (N)2.8 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ /Resources 51 0 R (3. Quality objectives. endobj q 2017-10-16T17:22:13-07:00 0.71 -671.089 l 37.07 0 Td (25)Tj << T* (21)Tj Official websites use .gov 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "third party" to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm 36 -24 Td T* T* /Filter /FlateDecode (14)Tj [(N)2 (o. ET NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES, WITHOUT OBJECTIONS, TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET NO. Such materials contain the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government's attorneys in summarizing the Government's understanding of information obtained in the interview, for instance by the emphasis in memoranda of the specific issues of interest to the Division's legal analysis. m)-2 (a)4 (l)-2 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. 6. 13 0 obj The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. Carefully review this statute to be sure that you don't miss anything. /TT1 12 Tf )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ >> GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. -46.494 -24 Td Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. /Author () f T* Responding party objects to this request as it does not seek relevant documents or documents reasonably calculated to the discovery of admissible evidence. /Type /Page << Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. )Tj (11)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm (7)Tj /Artifact <>BDC [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. /Contents [112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] /Rotate 0 1028. Improve lighting insulation by installing lightning arrestors in the last phase of the project. (24)Tj T* T* Q [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ )]TJ 2031.240 (pdf) states: (b) If the responding party objects to the demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of an item or category of item, the response shall do both of the following: (1) Identify with . Analytical Services; Analytical Method Development and Validation . >> /Font 153 0 R 29.4 648.61 Td (23)Tj dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( a)3.1 (nd r)-6.1 (e)3.9 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 (e)-5.9 (nc)3.9 (e)3.2 (s )-2 (a)3 ( va)-5.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-21.1 (y)19.1 ( of)3.8 ( t)-2.7 (ox)-9.2 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)19 ( )]TJ /Title () << stream -39.96 -12 Td 25.928 -24 Td >> -58.32 -48 Td 4. [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (n)-10.8 (t)-1.2 (o )]TJ BT [(1991 t)-1.1 (hr)2 (oug)10.9 (h 2017. [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . 0 0 612 792 re By RFP No. T* Copyright 2017, American Bar Association. /Rotate 0 332.51 0 Td T* (19)Tj q application/pdf /ITXT (2.1.7) [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. In reviewing the response, it is likely you are focusing in on the fact that there are garbage objections to your request and that you werent provided a privilege log. /GS0 gs T* ( )Tj T* [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.1 (S)-4 ( )]TJ At the same time, the court pointed out that the rules and decisions requiring specificity have been published for years. /Font 135 0 R [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. 36 0 Td Andrew Felser is with Felser, PC, in Denver, Colorado. P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ (20)Tj /Resources 115 0 R Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or information that are readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, from documents or information in Defendant's possession, or from documents or information that Defendant previously produced to Plaintiff. [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. A discovery request can ask what evidence the person knows, but cannot ask what a person thinks the evidence means. 17.451 -72 Td [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on, Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( )]TJ T* ET W n 0 0 612 792 re [(29, 2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. W n /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* f >> ( )Tj When Do I Have to Bring a Motion to Compel Written Discovery? Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants' possession, custody, or control. )]TJ [(P)-3.1 (r)2.9 (oc)3.1 (e)4.9 (dur)3 (e)3.2 ( \247 2033.010, )]TJ /GS0 gs << Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions. (9)Tj Q (3)Tj [(D)2 (E)-13 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)]TJ -411.35 -24 Td endobj 0 -24 TD endstream 28 0 obj >> /Length 143 0 R /Subtype /Type1 >> (13)Tj Plaintiff obtained any responsive information, other than the information that Defendant may derive from the materials described in the preceding paragraphs, from interviews of individuals by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. 47.75 0 Td /Type /Page C.C.P. 26 April 2023 . (7)Tj << T* 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re << T* 5 0 obj )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ 306.23 0 Td )25.903 (1)]TJ -332.51 -24 Td 58 0 obj Q Have you ever had a situation where the opposing side has responded to each of your document production requests with the response? [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d b)-20.8 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7.8 (i)-2.8 (o/)-2 (d)-9.1 (y)19.9 (n)-10.8 (a)4.8 (m)-2.8 (i)-2 (c)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.9 ( r)2.9 (e)3.1 (por)3 (t)-1.8 ( a)4.7 ( ki)-2.7 (dn)-9.2 (e)-6.8 (y)20.7 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.8 (or)3.7 ( )-9.9 (f)2.1 (or)3 ( c)4.8 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( )-10 (a)3.1 (ni)-1.9 (m)-1.2 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 ( N)1.9 (o. /Font 147 0 R In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. q T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] (19)Tj /Contents [96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R] stream 29.4 648.61 Td /Type /Pages endobj Q /TT0 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 527.1214635 755.2367083 cm 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* << << /XObject 146 0 R >> 36 -48 Td 1) The time to respond to a discovery request is 30 days after the Rule 26 (f) conference 2) Objections to Rule 34 [must] be stated with specificity 3) Production deadlines set within the ESI agreement must be adhered to 4) The producing party must state whether they are withholding .